Teachers are often unaware of the gender distribution of talk in their classrooms. They usually consider that they give equal amounts of attention to girls and boys, and it is only when they make a tape recording that they realize that boys are dominating the interactions.

Dale Spender, an Australian feminist who has been a strong advocate of female rights in this area, noted that teachers who tried to restore the balance by deliberately ‘favouring’ the girls were astounded to find that despite their efforts they continued to devote more time to the boys in their classrooms. Another study reported that a male science teacher who managed to create an atmosphere in which girls and boys contributed more equally to discussion felt that he was devoting 90 per cent of his attention to the girls. And so did his male pupils. They complained vociferously that the girls were getting too much talking time.

In other public contexts, too, such as seminars and debates, when women and men are deliberately given an equal amount of the highly valued talking time, there is often a perception that they are getting more than their fair share. Dale Spender explains this as follows:

The talkativeness of women has been gauged in comparison not with men but with silence. Women have not been judged on the grounds of whether they talk more than men, but of whether they talk more than silent women.

In other words, if women talk at all, this may be perceived as ‘too much’ by men who expect them to provide a silent, decorative background in many social contexts. This may sound outrageous, but think about how you react when precocious children dominate the talk at an adult party. As women begin to make inroads into formerly ‘male’ domains such as business and professional contexts, we should not be surprised to find that their contributions are not always perceived positively or even accurately.

[x] (via neighborly)

As a teacher, I give girls what I hope is a lot of attention.  I don’t know if I give girls their fair share, but I aspire to, especially after noticing that boys are willing to use their greater share of teachers’ attention to get girls who they feel aren’t being quiet and docile enough punished.  I have therefore acquired a reputation for “caring more about the girls.”  This has had two marked results: Some straight boys have gotten more hostile toward me, and most girls have gotten more confident around me.  This makes me think I’m doing something right.

Longer thoughts on how this phenomenon relates to sexual harassment in classrooms, if you’re interested: The girls figured out I won’t report them if they hit boys who are sexually harassing them, I’ll only report the boys.  This led to an increase in how often girls got the last word and boys got smacked in my classes, and, also, to a DECREASE IN HOW OFTEN GIRLS GOT SEXUALLY HARASSED.  The sexual harassers seem to have been depending on the sort of “equal blame” and “retaliation is never warranted” and “don’t hurt others’ feelings” perspectives so many schools try to instill in kids; the sexual harassers were usually the ones bringing me into the situation by saying, “Miss, she hit me!  You should write her up!”  Once they figured out I was only ever going to respond, “If you don’t treat girls like that, they won’t hit you,” the girls got more confident and the sexual harassers largely shut the fuck up.

In schools, fighting against sexual harassment is often punished exactly the same as, or more severely than, sexual harassment — a lot of discipline codes make no distinction between violence and violence in self-defence, and violence is ALWAYS the highest level of disciplinary infraction, whereas verbal sexual harassment rarely is.  Sexual harassers, at least in the schools I’ve been in, rely heavily on GETTING GIRLS IN TROUBLE WITH HIGHER AUTHORITIES as a strategy of harassment — creating an external punishment that penalises girls for and therefore discourages girls from fighting back.  Sexual harassers are willing to use their greater share of floorspace to ask to get girls who won’t date them punished.  By and large, teachers do punish those girls when they swear or hit.  Schools condition girls to ignore sexual harassment by punishing them when they speak up or fight back instead.

Once the sexual harassers in my classes understood that girls wouldn’t be punished for rejecting them, they backed off around me.  And there started to be a flip in what conversations I get called into — girls are telling me when boys are being nasty (too loud and dominant), instead of boys telling me when girls are being uncooperative (louder and more dominant than boys think they should be). (via torrentofbabies)

Why feminism is still relevant - [Guest Vlog]

[TRIGGER WARNING - mention of rape, slut shaming and victim blaming.]

Kinks is back with some tips on how to deal with those who think feminism is no longer relevant.

More guest videos: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFF49AAFE68A5E43E

Want to guest vlog for Those Pesky Dames? Click here to find out how!

This Dame: http://hellokinks.tumblr.com/

10 Reasons for Not Supporting Marriage Equality

I got my rainbow flag out specially. Well hey look at all the links down there…

Other good videos discussing marriage equality:

Lindsey (Pottermoosh) on the sarcaschicks: http://youtu.be/AU1eatd8CWU
Hank Green on the vlogbrothers: http://youtu.be/PD-INsIbVcw

LINKS!

UK Defence Secretary, Philip Hammond, claims gay marriage should not be a priority because the public is more worried about the economy: http://news.pinkpaper.com/NewsStory/7396/13/05/2012/defence-secretary-refuses…
UK Treasury failed to consider how spending cuts would affect women, disabled people and ethnic minorities: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/may/14/treasury-censured-spending-cuts…

“Why are you concentrating on X when Y is so much more important?”: http://finallyfeminism101.wordpress.com/2007/04/12/faq-why-are-you-concentrat…

Intersectionality and Marginalisation in Feminism playlist: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL16E067FEDEA1FAAA

“Trickle-down Justice”: http://fromonesurvivortoanother.tumblr.com/post/22772608474/i-finally-figured…

Gay Americans’ risk of mistaking marriage equality for total equality: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/may/13/gay-americans-…

This Dame:

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/somekindofbecca
Tumblr: http://somekindofbecca.tumblr.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/beccarothwell

Those Pesky Dames:

Tumblr: http://thosepeskydames.tumblr.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/thosepeskydames
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thosepeskydames

Hello thar!
So the results of our big meta/crisis week seem to be that we should just keep doing what we’re doing now, but start telling you what we’re talking about in advance, starting…NOW.
This week we thought we’d wade in on that whole marriage equality thing everyone’s been talking about, and the week after we’ll be talking about…we’re not quite sure yet but we’ll let you know soon.
So if you want to do a guest video on this (or any thing else) then let us know. ♥

Hello thar!

So the results of our big meta/crisis week seem to be that we should just keep doing what we’re doing now, but start telling you what we’re talking about in advance, starting…NOW.

This week we thought we’d wade in on that whole marriage equality thing everyone’s been talking about, and the week after we’ll be talking about…we’re not quite sure yet but we’ll let you know soon.

So if you want to do a guest video on this (or any thing else) then let us know. ♥

Feminism is not simply a struggle to end male chauvinism or a movement to ensure women have equal rights with men; it is a commitment to eradicating the ideology of domination that permeates Western culture on various levels - sex, race, class to name a few- and a commitment to reorganising US society so that the self-development of people can take precedence over imperialism, economic expansion and material desires.

- bell hooks

Feminism is not simply a struggle to end male chauvinism or a movement to ensure women have equal rights with men; it is a commitment to eradicating the ideology of domination that permeates Western culture on various levels - sex, race, class to name a few- and a commitment to reorganising US society so that the self-development of people can take precedence over imperialism, economic expansion and material desires.

- bell hooks

advocatephotos:


Ben & Jerry’s announced Tuesday that it is renaming one of its flavours to support the proposal to legalize same-sex marriage in the UK. By changing the name of its Oh! My! Apple Pie! ice cream to Apple-y Ever After, the company is hoping to raise awareness of the importance of the issue. In 2009, Ben & Jerry’s renamed their famous Chubby Hubby to Hubby Hubby to celebrate same-sex marriage being legalized in their home state of Vermont.

advocatephotos:

Ben & Jerry’s announced Tuesday that it is renaming one of its flavours to support the proposal to legalize same-sex marriage in the UK. By changing the name of its Oh! My! Apple Pie! ice cream to Apple-y Ever After, the company is hoping to raise awareness of the importance of the issue. In 2009, Ben & Jerry’s renamed their famous Chubby Hubby to Hubby Hubby to celebrate same-sex marriage being legalized in their home state of Vermont.

Coalition For Equal Marriage

Marriage is Unique

On this one point we agree. Marriage is unique. It is a union of two people in love, for life, to the exclusion of all others. A commitment upon which one can build a home and a family. We just think it should be available to all who want that commitment.

Be Glad of Redefinition

Marriage has not remained unchanged since the dawn of time. It has changed throughout history, adapting to each culture. In western culture it has more recently undergone changes to better protect the rights of women. Funnily enough, the Church of England (of which Lord Carey was head of as Archbishop of Canterbury) introduced divorce into marriage in the UK when it broke from the papacy. Divorce is the antithesis of marriage and the biggest change to the definition of marriage since its inception. Marriage changes all the time, and the churches themselves have been doing it. It isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Great Consequences

If marriage is redefined (again), those who believe in the modern definition of “traditional” marriage will still be married. They will still have the same sexual-orientation. Peoples’ careers will remain intact, the sun will keep shining, and toast will still have a tendency to land butter-side-down. Couples seeking to adopt or foster will still be assessed based on the needs of the child, as they should be. Also, if we’re very lucky, schools might teach kids not to be massive bigots like their parents, and we’ll be one step closer to a cohesive, mature, civilised society.


For people in the UK who believe marriage should be equally available to two consenting adults, regardless of their gender… Please sign the petition.

http://www.c4em.org.uk/

French Government publish guidelines to scrap ‘Mademoiselle’

Until now, women in France were required to identify themselves as married (Madame) or unmarried (Mademoiselle) on official forms. Everyone from the tax office to your car insurance company knew your marital status at a glance. Men only had one option (Monsieur), married or not and there was no neutral option like the English ‘Ms’.

Yesterday the French government advised that all women should be referred to as Madame, regardless of their marital status. Along with this they also asked ministries and regional administrations to remove, as much as possible, requests for ‘maiden names’ and references to spouse’s surnames.

Feminist groups, including Osez le féminisme and Les Chiennes de Garde, had run a long campaign against what they called the blatant discrimination against women on official forms and approved of the new guidelines although warning they need to be put into practice and not just pay lip service to the idea.

“We’re not stupid, we know we are in an election campaign season. So we will be vigilant to see that it is in fact applied,” said Julie Muret of Osez le féminisme.

The groups continue to ask private businesses follow suit and refer to all women as Madame.